The North-South Debate and the Terms of Trade: An Applied General Equilibrium Approach
Author(s) -
John Whalley
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
the review of economics and statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.999
H-Index - 165
eISSN - 1530-9142
pISSN - 0034-6535
DOI - 10.2307/1925823
Subject(s) - economics , general equilibrium theory , mathematical economics , keynesian economics , international economics , neoclassical economics , econometrics , international trade , macroeconomics
A price endogenous numerical general equilibrium model of world trade is used to analyze terms of trade issues in the North-South debate. Seven regions are identified, the U.S., EEC, Japan, Other Developed, OPEC, New Industrialized, and Less Developed Countries. The model is benchmarked to a global 1977 micro consistent data set. In the central case analysis, protectionist trade policies in the North inflict an annual welfare loss on the South of around 30 billion dollars per year with an associated terms of trade deterioration of around 9%. The annual welfare cost to the South from northern trade restrictions is somewhat larger than annual North-South aid flows. Protection in the South, and the potential terms of trade impacts of differential growth, are also analyzed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom