z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Power of Congress over the Rules of Precedent
Author(s) -
John Harrison
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
duke law journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.436
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1939-9111
pISSN - 0012-7086
DOI - 10.2307/1373096
Subject(s) - power (physics) , political science , law , law and economics , economics , physics , thermodynamics
In the Passenger Cases Chief Justice Taney expressed his willingness always to reconsider his Court’s constitutional doctrines. In Dickerson v. United States the Court declined to do as Chief Justice Taney said he would have done and adhered to Miranda v. Arizona without saying whether a majority of the Justices believed Miranda to have been correctly decided as an original matter. Suppose that some time between the Taney and Rehnquist Courts Congress had adopted a statute purporting to codify Chief Justice Taney’s suggestion by providing that the Supreme Court shall depart from its precedents whenever it believes them to be incorrect.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom