Back to the Future: From Critical Legal Studies Forward to Legal Realism, or How Not to Miss the Point of the Indeterminacy Argument
Author(s) -
John Hasnas
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
duke law journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.436
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1939-9111
pISSN - 0012-7086
DOI - 10.2307/1372948
Subject(s) - indeterminacy (philosophy) , argument (complex analysis) , legal realism , realism , epistemology , point (geometry) , legal formalism , law and economics , critical legal studies , positive economics , economics , philosophy , political science , law , legal research , mathematics , black letter law , private law , comparative law , chemistry , biochemistry , geometry
Senior Research Fellow, Kennedy Institute of Ethics. The author wishes to thank Madison Powers and William Blattner of Georgetown University; Richard Greenstein of Temple University School of Law; Loren Lomasky, Edward McClennen, Jim Child, Marvin Belzer, Christopher Morris, and Ellen Paul of Bowling Green State University; Charlotte Twight of Boise State University; Jennifer Roback of George Mason University; Raymond Belliotti of the State University of New York, Fredonia; Peter Boettke of New York University; and Ann Tunstall of the Weinberg Consulting Group for their exceedingly helpful comments. Thanks are also owed to Terrance Costello for his valuable research help and to Kory Swanson, Mary Dilsaver, and Tammi Sharp of the Social Philosophy and Policy Center for their assistance and support. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 1993 meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom