z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does Nonrandom Nest Placement Imply Nonrandom Nest Predation?: A Reply
Author(s) -
Robert J. Cooper,
R. Randy Wilson,
Gary Zenitsky,
Stephen J. Mullin,
Jennifer A. DeCecco,
Matthew R. Marshall,
Dorothy J. Wolf,
Lars Y. Pomara
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
ornithological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1938-5129
pISSN - 0010-5422
DOI - 10.2307/1370090
Subject(s) - predation , nest (protein structural motif) , generalist and specialist species , foraging , ecology , predator , optimal foraging theory , index (typography) , biology , computer science , habitat , biochemistry , world wide web
In response to the critique by Schmidt and Whelan (1999), we find that the relationship between nest success and tree selectivity is dependent upon inclusion or exclusion of particular tree species, whether or not years are pooled, and the selectivity index used. We question their use of point estimates of nest success with extremely high variances, defend our index, question the application of the Chesson (1983) index to our data, and explain the need to analyze years separately. Bottomland hardwood forest systems are extremely variable; hydroperiods alter the suitability of nesting substrates, availability of alternative food, and behavior of predators and their prey. Given these features, actively searching for Acadian Flycatcher (Empidonax virescens) nests is seldom an efficient predator foraging strategy. Therefore, these predation events are best described as random; nests are principally encountered opportunistically by generalist predators while searching for other prey.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom