The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession
Author(s) -
Harry Edwards
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
michigan law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.41
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1939-8557
pISSN - 0026-2234
DOI - 10.2307/1289788
Subject(s) - legal education , legal profession , legal ethics , law , legal realism , political science , legal opinion , black letter law , comparative law , private law
In the last analysis, the law is what the lawyers are. And the law and the lawyers are what the law schools make them. Felix Frankfurter' For some time now, I have been deeply concerned about the growing disjunction between legal education and the legal profession. I fear that our law schools and law firms are moving in opposite directions. The schools should be training ethical practitioners and producing scholarship that judges, legislators, and practitioners can use. The firms should be ensuring that associates and partners practice law in an ethical manner. But many law schools especially the so-called "elite" ones have abandoned their proper place, by emphasizing abstract theory at the expense of practical scholarship and pedagogy. Many law firms have also abandoned their place, by pursuing profit above all else. While the schools are moving toward pure theory, the firms are moving toward pure commerce, and the middle ground ethical practice has been deserted by both. This disjunction calls into question our status as an honorable profession.2 Over the past two decades, law and economics, law and literature, law and sociology, and various other "law and" movements have come to the fore in legal education. We also have seen a growth in critical
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom