z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of dust deposition on the performance of photovoltaic modules in Taxila, Pakistan
Author(s) -
Hafız Muhammad Ali,
M. Naveed Zafar,
Muhammad Bashir,
Muhammad Nasir,
Muzaffar Ali,
Aysha Siddiqui
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
thermal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.339
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 2334-7163
pISSN - 0354-9836
DOI - 10.2298/tsci140515046a
Subject(s) - monocrystalline silicon , photovoltaic system , materials science , deposition (geology) , crystallite , polycrystalline silicon , transmittance , atmosphere (unit) , optoelectronics , silicon , optics , environmental science , electrical engineering , composite material , meteorology , physics , metallurgy , engineering , paleontology , layer (electronics) , sediment , biology , thin film transistor
The air borne dust deposited on the surface of photovoltaic module influence the transmittance of solar radiations from the photovoltaic modules glazing surface. This experimental work aimed to investigate the effect of dust deposited on the surface of two different types of photovoltaic modules (monocrystalline silicon and polycrystalline silicon). Two modules of each type were used and one module from each pair was left exposed to natural atmosphere for three months of winter in Taxila, Pakistan. Systematic series of measurements were conducted for the time period of three months corresponding to the different dust densities. The difference between the output parameters of clean and dirty modules provided the information of percentage loss at different dust densities. The dust density deposited on the modules surface was 0.9867 mg/cm2 at the end of the study. The results showed that dust deposition has strong impact on the performance of photovoltaic modules. The monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules showed about 20% and 16% decrease of average output power, respectively, compared to the clean modules of same type. It was found that the reduction of module efficiency (ηclean – ηdirtv) in case of monocrystalline and polycrystalline module was 3.55% and 3.01%, respectively. Moreover the loss of output power and module efficiency in monocrystalline module was more compared to the polycrystalline module

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom