English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article discusses the issues concerning the relation between observation  and the scientific principles of objectivity, systematicity and reliability.  Issues of theoretical orientation, validity, generality, and precision will  be the subject of attention on another occasion. The disintegration of  observation as a research procedure through a radical separation of its  participant and non-participant form is highlighted. This happens under the  influence of exaggerated division between the quantitative and qualitative  methods and their actual but also exaggerated epistemological differences.  The exaggeration is associated with the dominance of empiricism in sociology.  This empiricism is the result of interests of wider social groups and  narrower interests within the scientific community. The necessity of  methodological examination and research implementation of observation  conceived as an integrated procedure is argued by its subversive character,  its objectivity and social changes that require its use. [Projekat  Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 179035: Izazovi nove drustvene  integracije u Srbiji: koncepti i akteri]

Objectivity, systematicity and reliability in implementing observation method in social sciences