English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper draws upon a variety of empirical sources to start critically  examining the concept of civil society in the context of both (post-)Yugoslav  anti-war and pacifist contention and the civic engagement stemming from it in  the nationally fragmented post-Yugoslav space. I argue that civil society can  no longer be meaningfully used for understanding the complex geometry of  social, political and personal interactions, cooperation's and resistances  within the regional civic spheres characterized by appreciable power  asymmetries. Its definitional volatility and logical incoherence allow civil  society to incorporate ideologically and historically extremely divergent  phenomena. Due to its conceptual elasticity, civil society is a cognitively  easily available device and a depoliticised theoretical paradigm convenient  for masking power networks frequently conditioned by foreign political  agendas. This paper points to possible alternative perspectives that might  prove more productive for analyzing (post-)Yugoslav bottom-up civic  engagement

A concept that is everything and nothing: Why not to study (post-)Yugoslav anti-war and pacifist contention from a civil society perspective