English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Current scientific and scholarly discourse on war, which represents the  legitimate knowledge and theory on war today, has been narrowed to the topics  and issues related to war doctrine and technology of war. It has become  reserved for the privileged „green collars“, highly skilled professionals and  officers inside the military structure, which act in cooperation with the  political and economic elites, forming the triumvirate of power in  contemporary world. The opportunities for civil critique of military politics  and strategies of wars have been decreased enormously, in spite of the fact  that contemporary wars have spread deeply into the civil sector of society.  By looking into the social context and political background of the knowledge  reserved for the military experts, we can develop insights into the process  of the ideological framing of wars today, marked by naturalization and  purposeful interpretations of wars, as if they are fought in the name of  democratization of global world. At the same time, the image of the  importance of human factor in war has been decreased, as much as  responsibility for causalities. Citizens have been pacified for the silent  acceptance of military politics promoted in their countries

Fuller’s theory of war and the changes in the concepts of warfare in the second half of XX century: The rise of "creative" war