English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The goal of the present study was to test the validity of a Serbian version   of the Perceived Stress Scale. The PSS was administered to 157 psychiatric   outpatients, 165 adults from the non-clinical population, and 283 university   students. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis supported a   bifactor model of the PSS with one general factor and two specific factors   reflecting perceived distress and perceived self-efficacy. Internal   consistencies of the scale and its two subscales were adequate across   clinical and non-clinical samples. Results supported the ability of the scale   to discriminate between clinical and non-clinical samples. The PSS evidenced   good convergent validity, showing moderate to high positive correlations with   measures of unpleasant emotional states and moderate negative correlations   with positive affect and life satisfaction. All but one correlation remained   significant after controlling for the measures of emotional distress. The   results of the present research support validity of the PSS and its use in   both clinical and non-clinical samples. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke   Republike Srbije, br. 179006

More than a (negative) feeling: Validity of the perceived stress scale in Serbian clinical and non-clinical samples