English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article revisits the relationship between corruption and Foreign Direct   Investment inflows in a panel of 42 countries from 1984 to 2012 using pooled   mean group estimator in a dynamic heterogeneous panel setting using   Westerlund and ARDL panel cointegration tests where the estimations are   carried out by three different estimators: the pooled mean group (PMG), mean   group (MG), and the dynamic fixed effect (DFE) estimators in order to examine   both the long- and short-term effects of corruption on FDI inflows. The   results suggest that corruption has a positive impact on FDI inflows in the   case of Asia and Africa; and a negative impact in the case of Latin America

Is corruption good or bad for FDI? Empirical evidence from Asia, Africa and Latin America