English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The main purposes of this paper are twofold: a) to determine if there are  significant differences on the determinants of public expenditures and tax  revenues between the so-called PIGS and the remaining Eurozone member states;  b) to uncover possible explanations for the different situations in which  these countries find themselves nowadays. The paper focus on the effects of  the cyclical state of the economy on those fiscal variables, and on the  actual adherence to the fiscal rules imposed by the Maastricht Treaty. Based  on the estimated results we conclude that the anti-cyclical reaction with  respect to the unemployment rate is much stronger among non-PIGS. We also  find that fiscal rules have, in general, not been followed by those two  groups of countries. Moreover, PIGS, in spite of their economic frailties,  have tried to emulate the fiscal behavior of their more prosperous Eurozone  partners instead of executing more rigorous policies

The roots of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis: PIGS vs non-PIGS