English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The ultraviolet absorption spectra of cyclohex-1-enylcarboxylic acid and 2methylcyclohex-1-enylcarboxylic acid were determined in six protic and nine aprotic solvents in the wavelength range from 200 to 400 nm. The position of the λmax of the two examined acids showed that the ultraviolet absorption maximums of cyclohex-1enylcarboxylic acidwere at consistently longerwavelengths in protic solvents than those of methylcyclohex-1-enylcarboxylic acid. The opposite was true in aprotic solvents. In order to explain the obtained results, the ultraviolet absorption frequencies of the electronic transitions in the carboxy carbonyl group of the examined acids were correlated using a total solvatochromic equation of the form: ν = ν0 + sπ* + aα + bβ, where π* is a measure of the solvent polarity, β represents the scale of solvent hydrogen bond acceptor basicities and α represents the scale of solvent hydrogen bond donor acidities. The correlation of the spectroscopic data was carried out bymeans of multiple linear regression analysis. The opposing solvent effects on the ultraviolet absorption maximums of the two examined acids were discussed.

Solvent effect on electronic absorption spectra of cyclohex-1-enylcarboxylic and 2-methylcyclohex-1-enylcarboxylic acids