English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Waterlogging is a major constraint of mungbean production in the tropical and   subtropical regions of the world and can cause a significant yield loss. The   study evaluated 100 mungbean genotypes for tolerance to waterlogging   employing rigorous field screening procedures. Three-week-old seedlings of   100 mungbean genotypes were subjected to waterlogging for 3 days maintaining   a waterlogging depth of 2.5 cm. Waterlogging tolerance was evaluated during   the periods of recovery and final harvest considering relative performance   (values of waterlogging relative to non-waterlogging controls) of 18 plant   traits. All the genotypes showed a wide range of variation in relative   values. Some genotypes subjected to waterlogging produced plenty of   adventitious roots that contributed to foliage development and chlorophyll   increment, which resulted in better shoot growth, and eventually yield of   mungbean increased. Nine plant traits highly associated in waterlogged   conditions were used in cluster analysis. The genotypes within cluster 6 and   cluster 7 performed better regarding almost all plant traits whereas cluster   4 performed very poorly. Discriminant function analysis showed that function   1 and function 2 explained 54.5% and 32.2%, respectively and altogether   86.7% variation in the genotypes. The harvest index and straw dry matter   mostly explained the total variance in function 1. Dry matter of root, shoot   and straw explained the maximum variance in function 2. Root dry matter   played the most dominant role in explaining the maximum variance in the   genotypes. The genotypes IPSA-10 and VC 6379 (23-11) showed a better degree   of tolerance to waterlogging concerning yield and associated   morpho-physiological traits.

Evaluation of yield and yield-related traits for waterlogging tolerance in mungbean genotypes using multivariate techniques