English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

How do we ethnographically chart the ways in which a recent war-ridden past   features in everyday identifications of young adults, who have little or no   direct experience of that past? One way is to treat this question as a matter   of how everyday knowledge is constituted and transferred between individuals,   as well as how historical legacies, cultural and political models enter their   life-worlds, what they think and know, and who they are. These inquiries   stood at the core of the study I conducted among two high-school classes   between 2007 and 2009 in Novi Sad. This article will shed light on my main   conclusions and problematize the notion of collective confrontation with the   past. My contention is that arguments for collective confrontation with the   past, together with official policies informed by this discourse, need to   take into account social psychological mechanisms of identity construction in   order to avoid the assumption that knowledge and moral insight can be mapped   onto people’s minds

The significance of Serbia’s recent war-ridden past for young people’s identity perceptions