English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper provides a parallel linguistic and conceptual reading of   Wittgenstein’s and Beckett’s works. More specifically, the Tractatus   Logico-Philosophicus and the Philosophical Investigations are looked at in   relation to the absurd plays Not I and Waiting for Godot, respectively. The   limits of language as described in the Tractatus are part of the verbally   and conceptually asphyxiating world brought on stage by Beckett in the   monologue Not I, while the transition to ‘language games’ of the   Philosophical Investigations can be identified in parts of Waiting for   Godot. The suggested conclusion is that Wittgenstein’s expression of the   ineffable, the problematic use of language and (its) meaning can be and have   been expressed in a form of art, while the meanings of Wittgenstein’s   writings are in harmony with their stylistic form, his concept of ‘showing’   further illustrating this idea

Wittgenstein’s language and Beckett: The limits of language and the absurd