English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The paper takes as its starting point the figure of the owl as the emblem of   philosophy, it looks at its history and takes up its most significant   philosophical use, the notorious passage where Hegel uses the owl as the   indication of philosophy’s necessary belatedness. This is the passage which   is usually taken as the point of indictment of Hegel’s position and the role   he ascribed to philosophy. Hegel’s adage ‘What is rational is actual, and   what is actual is rational’ is scrutinized in its various aspects,   particularly in view of its other version, ‘what is rational must happen’.   The tension between the ‘is’ and the ‘ought’ is perhaps the clue to   understanding this adage, where Hegel doesn’t opt for the one or the other,   but aims at the paradoxical intersection of the two. Hegel’s adage is put in   contrast with Marx’s Thesis Eleven. The paper considers the concepts of the   rational, the actual, the belatedness/retroaction, the grayness and finally   the owl (and the part that bestiary plays in philosophy), thus trying to   circumscribe the task that should be assigned to philosophy

The owl of Minerva from dusk till dawn, or, two shades of gray