English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper focuses on the scandal that occurred in 2001 during the intensive  investigation of the financial transfers from Serbia to Cyprus during the  1990s. The paper looks at the strategies employed by politicians,  practitioners and civil servants to achieve their political agendas. The  findings prove that most actors take one of the following positions. They  either share information about corruption scandals with the public in order  to gain legitimacy for anti-corruption action, or they coordinate their joint  response and avoid talking about the scandals in order to reduce political  costs

Anti-corruption discourse and institutional change in Serbia: The money in Cyprus scandal