Microarray missing values imputation methods: Critical analysis review
Author(s) -
M. Hourani,
Emary El
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
computer science and information systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.244
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 2406-1018
pISSN - 1820-0214
DOI - 10.2298/csis0902165h
Subject(s) - computer science , imputation (statistics) , missing data , data mining , complement (music) , cluster analysis , support vector machine , artificial intelligence , algorithm , machine learning , pattern recognition (psychology) , gene , biochemistry , chemistry , complementation , phenotype
Gene expression data often contain missing expression values. For the purpose of conducting an effective clustering analysis and since many algorithms for gene expression data analysis require a complete matrix of gene array values, choosing the most effective missing value estimation method is necessary. In this paper, the most commonly used imputation methods from literature are critically reviewed and analyzed to explain the proper use, weakness and point the observations on each published method. From the conducted analysis, we conclude that the Local Least Square (LLS) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) algorithms have achieved the best performances. SVR can be considered as a complement algorithm for LLS especially when applied to noisy data. However, both algorithms suffer from some deficiencies presented in choosing the value of Number of Selected Genes (K) and the appropriate kernel function. To overcome these drawbacks, the need for new method that automatically chooses the parameters of the function and it also has an appropriate computational complexity is imperative.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom