z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Palliative chemotherapy followed by consolidation radiotherapy in patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer not suitable for radical treatment
Author(s) -
Hany Eldeeb,
Philip Camileri,
Choi Mak
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
archive of oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.104
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1450-9520
pISSN - 0354-7310
DOI - 10.2298/aoo1202008e
Subject(s) - medicine , retrospective cohort study , hazard ratio , lung cancer , chemotherapy , radiation therapy , single center , performance status , stage (stratigraphy) , oncology , confidence interval , multivariate analysis , paleontology , biology
Background: This is a retrospective study to assess the effectiveness of consolidation radiotherapy (CRT) following palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not suitable for radical treatment. Methods: This study involved retrospective analysis of a prospective database of Northampton Oncology Center from January 2005 through December 2010, 63 patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC treated at the oncology center were enrolled. Patients were either treated with high dose (39/36 Gy /13-12 fractions, group 1) or low dose (20 Gy /5 fractions, group 2) CRT or there were those who were not offered any CRT (group 3). Results: There was no significant difference between the three groups as regard age, sex, performance status, comorbidities or chemotherapy given. However, there was a statistically significant difference as regard the stage P = 0.009 with more stage IV patients at group II and III compared to group I. The mean survival for the three groups was 27m, 14m & 15m respectively. There was a statistically significant improvement of survival in patients treated with high dose palliative CRT compared to the other two groups (P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis only the radiotherapy dose remains as the only statistical significant factor affecting the survival with hazard ratio 0.372 and confidence interval (0.147-0.726). Conclusion: Despite the limitation of our retrospective study, it is worth considering CRT approach for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC - not suitable for radical treatment - who have not progressed on chemotherapy

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom