English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Despite the wide usage of exercise ECG tests and Duke Treadmill Score (DTS)   in clinical practice, no comparison between this scoring system and   Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) has yet been made, particularly in cases of   angiographically verified borderline lesions. Thirty patients with single   coronary lesions and angiographically assessed borderline stenosis (between   30-70%) and previously calculated intermediate values of DTS between -10 to   +4 were examined using FFR. Adequate specificity and sensitivity (0.769 and   0.556, respectively) were in a more narrow range of -0.5 to -10. Sex and age   did not have an influence on the DTS values. There was a correlation between   the values of FFR and age (r=0.395, p=0.031) and between angiographic   assessment of stenosis and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (r=0.648,   p<0.0001). In the study population, a decision on revascularization could not   be based solely on angiographic or QCA assessment of the artery or on the   values of DTS

Fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate values of Duke Treadmill Score and borderline coronary lesions