Non-invasive screening: The probability of events
Author(s) -
Dragan Lončar,
Slobodan Јаnkovic,
Dragan Milovanović,
Olivera Milošević-Djordjević,
Miroslav Stojadinović,
Slavica Lončar
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
archives of biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.217
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1821-4339
pISSN - 0354-4664
DOI - 10.2298/abs1103609l
Subject(s) - likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing , odds ratio , abnormality , diagnostic odds ratio , odds , medicine , test (biology) , likelihood ratio test , obstetrics , false positive rate , credibility , statistics , confidence interval , biology , logistic regression , mathematics , paleontology , psychiatry , political science , law
Congenital anomalies are the cause of 20.0-25.0% of cases of perinatal death, while 3.0% of children are born with malformations of varying size. We examined the predictive values and defined the credibility ratio of the combined test results. Sensitivity of the test is 94.0%, and specificity is 99.0%. The positive likelihood ratio [likelihood ratio test (LR+)] is 94.00; a negative likelihood ratio [likelihood ratio test (LR-)] is 0.06. The pretest probability that pregnant women carry a fetus with chromosomal abnormality is 1:250. Posttest odds after the combined test to discover this abnormality are 0.3760, and probability of the same case is 0.2732 if it happens that the test result is positive. The result of our study confirms the justification of combined test usage in routine clinical practice, since the posttest odds rate in the case of a positive screening increases several times over (almost 90 times); the probability of detecting a chromosomal abnormality was about 70 times
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom