Comparison of extraction methods for the hypotensive drugs from Eucommia ulmoides
Author(s) -
Hui Cao
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
archives of biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.217
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1821-4339
pISSN - 0354-4664
DOI - 10.2298/abs1003725c
Subject(s) - eucommia ulmoides , extraction (chemistry) , supercritical fluid extraction , chromatography , chemistry , bark (sound) , solvent , biology , biochemistry , medicine , ecology , alternative medicine , pathology , traditional chinese medicine
Extraction methods using Soxhlet extraction (SE), enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction (EE), semi-bionic extraction (SBE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were evaluated for the yields of geniposidic acid (GPA) and geniposide (GPS) from the bark of Eucommia ulmoides. The results showed that the yields of GPA and GPS attained by EE and SBE were highest, respectively. Compared with various extraction methods for the extraction of GPA and GPS, the SBE was more efficient than other methods. There was no organic solvent used in SBE. The pH values of semi-bionic extraction were the same as in the human body. The results indicate that SBE can be used for large-scale and efficient extraction of GPA and GPS from plant materials. The time taken by SFE was longer than other methods, but the yields of GPA and GPS were the lowest.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom