z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of two sample preparation procedures for HPLC determination of ochratoxin A
Author(s) -
Gorica Vuković,
Snežana Pavlović,
M. S. Ristić
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
archives of biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.217
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1821-4339
pISSN - 0354-4664
DOI - 10.2298/abs0904639v
Subject(s) - chromatography , clean up , ochratoxin a , chemistry , extraction (chemistry) , phosphoric acid , sample preparation , reproducibility , solid phase extraction , high performance liquid chromatography , ochratoxin , mycotoxin , food science , organic chemistry
In preparation of samples for chromatographic determination of ochratoxin A, two types of columns were used for sample cleanup (SPE and immunoaffinity columns). The first method consisted of liquid-liquid extraction with a mixture of chloroform and phosphoric acid, followed by ion-exchange cleanup on Waters Oasis MAX columns. The second method consisted of extraction with a mixture of water and methanol, followed by LCTech OtaCLEAN immunoaffinity column cleanup. Recoveries of the methods were determined at three levels in three repetitions for maize flour, and they were 84% (%RSD = 19.2) for the first method of sample preparation and 101% (%RSD = 2.2) for the second method. Values of LOQ for OTA were 0.25 and 1.00 μg/kg for the IAC and SPE clean-up procedures, respectively. Both methods comply with present regulations, but the MAX sample clean-up procedure should be used as an alternative, since the immunoaffinity column clean-up procedure is characterized by better reproducibility, accuracy, and efficiency

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom