English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Through the analysis of historiographical and theoretical bibliography, principally from sociology and political science, this paper analyzes the relationship of national-popular movements, understood as a specific type of populism, with public policies. The concept of national-popular movements is used to typify the nationalist anti-oligarchy movements that appeared in Latin America in the second third of the twentieth century and to analyze their main characteristics, focusing on their democratizing as well as anti-liberal nature. For this purpose, the paper proposes the use of a minimum ideational definition of populism and a cumulative definition for national-popular movements. It argues that, although it is impossible to associate populism with a specific type of public policy, this is possible in the case of national-popular movements, which promoted democratizing public policies, aimed at social integration, whilst maintaining an anti-liberal bias.

Los movimientos nacional-populares y sus políticas públicas: nacionalismo antioligárquico, democratización y antiliberalismo