DERECHO Y VIOLENCIA: LA “OBJETIVIDAD” COMO ESPACIO DE SU INDISTINCIÓN. EL CASO DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA DE 1980. | Zendy

Jaime Mercado Bassa | Zendy; Nicolás Fuster Sánchez | Zendy; Christian Viera | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

DERECHO Y VIOLENCIA: LA “OBJETIVIDAD” COMO ESPACIO DE SU INDISTINCIÓN. EL CASO DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA DE 1980.

Author(s) -

Jaime Mercado Bassa,

Nicolás Fuster Sánchez,

Christian Viera

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

revista de ciencias sociales

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 0719-8442

pISSN - 0716-7725

DOI - 10.22370/rcs.2019.75.2283

Subject(s) - constitution , constitutionalism , aside , objectivity (philosophy) , politics , humanities , interpretation (philosophy) , philosophy , reading (process) , sociology , political science , law , epistemology , democracy , linguistics

This paper explores the complex relationship between law and violence. It proposes a critical reading of the interpretation mechanisms that try to override the political dimensions of the Constitution. In particular, it ana- lyzes the “originalism” of the Chilean constitutionalism that appeals to the objectivity of the Constitution, founded in the notion of truth hidden behind the idea of origin. Following the critical theory approach –Benjamin, Fou- cault, among others– the paper questions the assumptions that set aside the debate on the political content of the 1980 Chilean Constitution.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research