z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
12. Interactive Groups: Examining and Interrogating Issues of Heterogeneity and Accountability
Author(s) -
Gail Frost,
Maureen Connolly
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
collected essays on learning and teaching
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2368-4526
DOI - 10.22329/celt.v2i0.3206
Subject(s) - accountability , competence (human resources) , equity (law) , anticipation (artificial intelligence) , psychology , group work , pedagogy , framing (construction) , mathematics education , public relations , sociology , social psychology , political science , computer science , structural engineering , artificial intelligence , law , engineering
Teachers and learners alike bring past experiences into present teaching and learning contexts. Group work is an experience that carries equal measures of joyful anticipation and mournful trepidation. Learners typically experience group work as an uneven distribution of time, competence, and accountability, and seem to have lingering memories of one or two people doing all the work in order to salvage a respectable grade. While students must understand the group process when they work in problem- or inquiry-based teams, we think the onus should also be on the instructor to devise methods of equity and accountability, which address the aforementioned justifiable fears. Our paper will describe several strategies we have used to anticipate and offset the inevitable tensions and contingencies inherent in group work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom