Peer Review, Scholarly Production and a Provocation: Let’s Blow Stuff Up | Zendy

David N. Wright | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Peer Review, Scholarly Production and a Provocation: Let’s Blow Stuff Up

Author(s) -

David N. Wright

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

scholarly and research communication

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 1923-0702

DOI - 10.22230/src.2014v5n4a185

Subject(s) - provocation test , production (economics) , presentation (obstetrics) , work (physics) , peer production , control (management) , scholarly communication , public relations , knowledge production , sociology , political science , knowledge management , computer science , law , management , engineering , economics , medicine , mechanical engineering , alternative medicine , radiology , pathology , publishing , macroeconomics

Academics tend to control scholarly processes by emphasizing strict adherence to formal presentation styles that may not be relevant to contemporary modes or platforms for scholarly work. Arguing for a scholarly approach that foregrounds open processes, this article suggests that academics cede control over conversations about peer review by ending with a provocation to account for emerging audiences and producers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research