z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Examining Professional Stereotypes in an Interprofessional Education Simulation Experience
Author(s) -
Alison Bealle Rudd,
Julie M. Estis,
Bill Pruitt,
Theresa Wright
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of research in interprofessional practice and education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1916-7342
DOI - 10.22230/jripe.2016v6n1a228
Subject(s) - stereotype (uml) , health professions , psychology , significant difference , interprofessional education , socialization , sample (material) , medical education , nursing , medicine , social psychology , health care , economics , chemistry , economic growth , chromatography
Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) provides a platform for early professional socialization, potentially affecting the accuracy of stereotypes among health professions students. The purpose of this study was to implement an interprofessional simulation with nursing, respiratory therapy (RT), and speech language pathology (SLP) students, and using the Student Stereotype Rating Questionnaire, evaluate how an IPE simulation approach may alter stereotypes that learners carry with them related to themselves and professions other than their own. Methods and Findings: Participants rated the extent to which they believe attributes, based on nine professional characteristics, apply to either their own profession (autostereotypes), other professions (heterostereotypes), or their own profession as seen by others (perceived autostereotypes) with the Student Stereotype Rating Questionnaire (SSRQ). A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used, and descriptive and analytical statistics conducted within and across groups. Participant impressions of the IPE experience are presented. Main limitations included smaller sample size of RT and SLP participants. Conclusions: Results showed a significant difference from pre- to post-IPE simulation in nursing heterostereoptype, autostereotype, and perceived autostereotype scores. No significant difference was seen in hetereostereotypes of RT and SLP students. Overall, student impressions were positive. Recommendations include study replication for larger sample size.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom