English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of the present work is to analyze succinctly and without any exhausting purpose, the state of the question of surrogate motherhood in two legal models of opposing signs: the Spanish model, governed by the prohibition of surrogacy; and those of two Mexican states, Tabasco and Sinaloa, where the procreative process is regulated with certain guarantees for the weakest part of the legal relationship: the pregnant mother. It is my purpose to defend the need for an urgent regulation in Spain that gives a complete, up-to-date and respectful response to the fundamental dignity and rights of all parties: primarily, the unborn child, who, unlike what happens in adoption (looking for a family for the child) is the search for a child for a family. The examination of comparative law offers an irreplaceable tool in the search for fair law and the –necessarily brief– review of the legal models of Tabasco and Sinaloa involves an advance towards the debate that we want and need in Spain.

revista del posgrado en derecho de la unam

La regulación de la maternidad subrogada en los estados de Tabasco y Sinaloa. Comparativa con la prohibición de maternidad por sustitución del derecho español