z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Caring for social complexity in nanomedicine
Author(s) -
Michael Schillmeier
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
nanomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1748-6963
pISSN - 1743-5889
DOI - 10.2217/nnm.15.149
Subject(s) - ethos , action (physics) , variety (cybernetics) , perspective (graphical) , nanomedicine , sociology , engineering ethics , psychology , political science , nanotechnology , computer science , engineering , materials science , physics , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics , nanoparticle , law
In this paper, I will discuss from a ‘Science and Technology Studies’ perspective three different modes of caring about the social complexity in biomedical and nanomedical research. Nanomedical research unfolds a variety of issues that generate different concerns, questions, problems, requirements and interests that connect with different systems of action (in vitro, in vivo), different kinds (human, nonhuman) and different scales of action (nano, micro, macro). To adequately address the social complexity, I will discuss three possible modes of caring about social complexity: laboratory experiment and scientific analysis, public expert controversies, and publics. These different modes of caring share an experimental ethos that engages nanomedical issues for which no common solutions are available.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom