z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Safety and Effectiveness of Classical and Alternative Sunitinib Dosing Schedules For Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
Author(s) -
Ṣẹ̀yẹ Abògúnr̀in,
Ajibade Ashaye,
Joseph C. Cappelleri,
Andrew Clair,
Kyle Fahrbach,
Krishnan Ramaswamy,
Lucile Serfass,
Sandy Srinivas,
Despina Thomaidou,
Giovanni Zanotti
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
future oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.857
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1744-8301
pISSN - 1479-6694
DOI - 10.2217/fon-2018-0858
Subject(s) - medicine , sunitinib , renal cell carcinoma , meta analysis , oncology , dosing , observational study , odds ratio , adverse effect
The optimal dosing schedule to maintain the effectiveness of sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma – while reducing toxicity – remains an important clinical question. A meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies assessed the relative treatment effects of 4/2, 2/1 and transitional-2/1 schedules on outcomes and adverse events using Bayesian network meta-analysis methods. Treatment with 2/1 reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% and had lower odds of hand-and-foot syndrome compared with the 4/2. A numerical but not ‘statistical’ benefit in progression-free survival was observed with the transitional-2/1 compared with 4/2. Alternative schedules with the 2/1 and transitional-2/1 may be more clinically beneficial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma than the 4/2 schedule.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom