Safety and Effectiveness of Classical and Alternative Sunitinib Dosing Schedules For Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
Author(s) -
Ṣẹ̀yẹ Abògúnr̀in,
Ajibade Ashaye,
Joseph C. Cappelleri,
Andrew Clair,
Kyle Fahrbach,
Krishnan Ramaswamy,
Lucile Serfass,
Sandy Srinivas,
Despina Thomaidou,
Giovanni Zanotti
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
future oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.857
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1744-8301
pISSN - 1479-6694
DOI - 10.2217/fon-2018-0858
Subject(s) - medicine , sunitinib , renal cell carcinoma , meta analysis , oncology , dosing , observational study , odds ratio , adverse effect
The optimal dosing schedule to maintain the effectiveness of sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma – while reducing toxicity – remains an important clinical question. A meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies assessed the relative treatment effects of 4/2, 2/1 and transitional-2/1 schedules on outcomes and adverse events using Bayesian network meta-analysis methods. Treatment with 2/1 reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% and had lower odds of hand-and-foot syndrome compared with the 4/2. A numerical but not ‘statistical’ benefit in progression-free survival was observed with the transitional-2/1 compared with 4/2. Alternative schedules with the 2/1 and transitional-2/1 may be more clinically beneficial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma than the 4/2 schedule.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom