z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pixantrone–Rituximab Versus Gemcitabine–Rituximab In Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Author(s) -
David Belada,
Pencho Georgiev,
Shaker R. Dakhil,
Lowell F Inhorn,
David Andorsky,
J. Thaddeus Beck,
Donald P. Quick,
Ruth Pettengell,
Robert Daly,
James P. Dean,
Mariya Pavlyuk,
Nelly Failloux,
Kai Hübel
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
future oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.857
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1744-8301
pISSN - 1479-6694
DOI - 10.2217/fon-2016-0137
Subject(s) - rituximab , medicine , gemcitabine , oncology , lymphoma , follicular lymphoma , refractory (planetary science) , autologous stem cell transplantation , chemotherapy , physics , astrobiology
We describe the rationale and design of the ongoing randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy of pixantrone and rituximab versus gemcitabine and rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular grade 3 lymphoma, who are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, and who failed front-line regimens containing rituximab. The administration schedule is pixantrone 50 mg/m(2) intravenously (iv.) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) iv. on days 1, 8 and 15, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) iv. on day 1, up to six cycles. Pixantrone has a conditional European marketing approval for monotherapy in adults with multiple relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our trial explores the efficacy of combining pixantrone with rituximab and completes postauthorization measures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom