English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim: Investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of BTH1677/cetuximab, with and without irinotecan, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients &amp; methods: Patients with recurrent or progressive mCRC were assigned to BTH1677/cetuximab/irinotecan (group 1; n = 10) or BTH1677/cetuximab (group 2; n = 22). Adverse events, PK parameters and tumor response were assessed. Results &amp; conclusion: Adverse events were consistent with those expected of the backbone therapy of cetuximab/irinotecan (group 1) or cetuximab alone (group 2). The BTH1677 PK profiles were similar in the two groups. The overall response rates were 30.0% (group 1) and 22.7% (group 2); in KRAS wild-type subset analysis, rates were 42.9% and 45.5%, respectively. BTH1677 therapy was tolerable and warrants further evaluation for treatment of mCRC.

BTH1677 in combination with cetuximab with and without irinotecan in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer