Auditory comprehension performance of college students with and without sport concussion on Computerized-Revised Token Test Subtest VIII
Author(s) -
Anthony P. Salvatore,
Michael P. Cannito,
Heather E. Brassil,
Edina R. Bene,
Bess Sirmon-Taylor
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
concussion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.205
H-Index - 3
ISSN - 2056-3299
DOI - 10.2217/cnc-2016-0024
Subject(s) - audiology , cognition , psychology , concussion , analysis of variance , test (biology) , comprehension , poison control , medicine , injury prevention , psychiatry , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , environmental health , biology
Aim: Auditory comprehension (AC) and visually assessed cognitive functions were compared in early stage postconcussed (PC) athletes and healthy controls using the Subtest VIII of the Computerized-Revised Token Test (C-RTT) and Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT). Results: As compared with healthy controls (n = 30), PC subjects (n = 30) had significantly lower C-RTT efficiency scores (p = 0.018), and lower ImPACT scores; total symptom score (p = 0.000.), verbal memory (p = 0.000), visual memory (p = 0.000), visual motor speed (p = 0.000) and reaction time (p = 0.004) in this post-test only matched subject design. Impulse Control was not significant (p = 0.613). Multiple regression and ANOVA indicated an association with reaction time only (p = 0.012) for the PC subjects. After controlling for reaction time, a significant difference in AC remained. Conclusion: The relationship between AC and other visually assessed cognitive functions was inconsistent suggesting that the C-RTT and ImPACT assessed different functional systems.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom