Comparative effectiveness research and big data: balancing potential with legal and ethical considerations
Author(s) -
Elizabeth A. Gray,
Jane Hyatt Thorpe
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of comparative effectiveness research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.567
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 2042-6313
pISSN - 2042-6305
DOI - 10.2217/cer.14.51
Subject(s) - big data , scope (computer science) , comparative effectiveness research , medicine , psychological intervention , ethical issues , health care , data science , quality (philosophy) , medical research , risk analysis (engineering) , engineering ethics , alternative medicine , nursing , computer science , political science , data mining , law , engineering , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , programming language
Big data holds big potential for comparative effectiveness research. The ability to quickly synthesize and use vast amounts of health data to compare medical interventions across settings of care, patient populations, payers and time will greatly inform efforts to improve quality, reduce costs and deliver more patient-centered care. However, the use of big data raises significant legal and ethical issues that may present barriers or limitations to the full potential of big data. This paper addresses the scope of some of these legal and ethical issues and how they may be managed effectively to fully realize the potential of big data.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom