Comparative effectiveness from a single-arm trial and real-world data: alectinib versus ceritinib
Author(s) -
Jessica Davies,
Michael Martinec,
Paul Delmar,
Mathieu Coudert,
Walter Bordogna,
Sophie Golding,
Reynaldo Martina,
Gracy Crane
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of comparative effectiveness research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.567
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 2042-6313
pISSN - 2042-6305
DOI - 10.2217/cer-2018-0032
Subject(s) - alectinib , ceritinib , medicine , anaplastic lymphoma kinase , hazard ratio , oncology , lung cancer , clinical trial , proportional hazards model , propensity score matching , confidence interval , malignant pleural effusion
Aim: To compare the overall survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received alectinib with those who received ceritinib. Materials & methods: Two treatment arms (alectinib [n = 183] and ceritinib [n = 67]) were extracted from clinical trials and an electronic health record database, respectively. Propensity scores were applied to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox regression were conducted. Results: After propensity score adjustment, baseline characteristics were balanced. Alectinib had a prolonged median overall survival (alectinib = 24.3 months and ceritinib = 15.6 months) and lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48–0.88). Conclusion: Alectinib was associated with prolonged overall survival versus ceritinib, which is consistent with efficacy evidence from clinical trials.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom