Validation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Criteria for AKI and Comparison of Three Criteria in Hospitalized Patients | Zendy

Tomoko Fujii | Zendy; Shigehiko Uchino | Zendy; Masanori Takinami | Zendy; Rinaldo Bellomo | Zendy

Open Access

Validation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Criteria for AKI and Comparison of Three Criteria in Hospitalized Patients

Author(s) -

Tomoko Fujii,

Shigehiko Uchino,

Masanori Takinami,

Rinaldo Bellomo

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

clinical journal of the american society of nephrology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.755

H-Index - 151

eISSN - 1555-905X

pISSN - 1555-9041

DOI - 10.2215/cjn.09530913

Subject(s) - rifle , medicine , acute kidney injury , kidney disease , receiver operating characteristic , retrospective cohort study , renal function , emergency medicine , observational study , creatinine , area under the curve , stage (stratigraphy) , intensive care medicine , paleontology , archaeology , biology , history

AKI is a major clinical problem and predictor of outcome in hospitalized patients. In 2013, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group published the third consensus AKI definition and classification system after the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Kidney Function, and End-Stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) working group systems. It is unclear which system achieves optimal prognostication in hospital patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research