Evaluation of the Classification Accuracy of the Kidney Biopsy Direct Immunofluorescence through Convolutional Neural Networks
Author(s) -
Giulia Ligabue,
Federico Pollastri,
Francesco Fontana,
Marco Leonelli,
Luciana Furci,
Silvia Giovanella,
Gaetano Alfano,
Gianni Cappelli,
Francesca Testa,
Federico Bolelli,
Costantino Grana,
Riccardo Magistroni
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical journal of the american society of nephrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.755
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1555-905X
pISSN - 1555-9041
DOI - 10.2215/cjn.03210320
Subject(s) - medicine , convolutional neural network , biopsy , immunofluorescence , pathology , kidney , artificial intelligence , radiology , antibody , computer science , immunology
Background and objectives Immunohistopathology is an essential technique in the diagnostic workflow of a kidney biopsy. Deep learning is an effective tool in the elaboration of medical imaging. We wanted to evaluate the role of a convolutional neural network as a support tool for kidney immunofluorescence reporting. Design, setting, participants, & measurements High-magnification (×400) immunofluorescence images of kidney biopsies performed from the year 2001 to 2018 were collected. The report, adopted at the Division of Nephrology of the AOU Policlinico di Modena, describes the specimen in terms of “appearance,” “distribution,” “location,” and “intensity” of the glomerular deposits identified with fluorescent antibodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, C1q and C3 complement fractions, fibrinogen, and κ - and λ -light chains. The report was used as ground truth for the training of the convolutional neural networks. Results In total, 12,259 immunofluorescence images of 2542 subjects undergoing kidney biopsy were collected. The test set analysis showed accuracy values between 0.79 (“irregular capillary wall” feature) and 0.94 (“fine granular” feature). The agreement test of the results obtained by the convolutional neural networks with respect to the ground truth showed similar values to three pathologists of our center. Convolutional neural networks were 117 times faster than human evaluators in analyzing 180 test images. A web platform, where it is possible to upload digitized images of immunofluorescence specimens, is available to evaluate the potential of our approach. Conclusions The data showed that the accuracy of convolutional neural networks is comparable with that of pathologists experienced in the field.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom