z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Treating Diabetic Nephropathy
Author(s) -
Julia B. Lewis
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical journal of the american society of nephrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.755
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1555-905X
pISSN - 1555-9041
DOI - 10.2215/cjn.01170307
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetic nephropathy , diabetes mellitus , urology , nephropathy , intensive care medicine , endocrinology
An irrefutable body of evidence from multiple well-powered clinical trials and numerous clinical studies in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has demonstrated that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) retards the progression of diabetic nephropathy (1–11). The consistency of these clinical trial outcomes has resulted in guidelines from diabetes and renal societies to treat all patients with diabetes and diabetic nephropathy with drugs that inhibit the RAS (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI]) and/or angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARB) (12,13). The article by Ficociello et al. in this issue of CJASN documents the challenges and pitfalls of transporting these clinical trial and study results to a general population of patients (14). It is disheartening to read that, even in the most recent time of observation, 33% of patients with diabetic nephropathy did not receive any ACEI therapy despite current guideline recommendations. The transportability of clinical trial results is affected by differences between the study population and the general clinic population. By design, patients in clinical trials are judged to be compliant, do not have diseases other than diabetic nephropathy that could affect their kidney function, have clearly defined and accurately measured kidney function, and must meet many other inclusion and exclusion criteria. Certainly the general population of patients differs from those in a clinical trial, and those differences can affect the perceived efficacy of the intervention. The large number of patients in the observational study by Ficociello et al. with HgAIC levels far above those recommended by guidelines despite attendance in a dedicated diabetes clinic would suggest noncompliance. Interventions cannot benefit patients if they are not compliant or if the interventions are not properly implemented. Patients entering clinical trials are likely more compliant on average than a general clinic population. In addition, important …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom