Comparison of Volume Overload with Cycler-Assisted versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis | Zendy

Sara N. Davison | Zendy; Gian S. Jhangri | Zendy; Kailash Jindal | Zendy; Neesh Pannu | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of Volume Overload with Cycler-Assisted versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Author(s) -

Sara N. Davison,

Gian S. Jhangri,

Kailash Jindal,

Neesh Pannu

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

clinical journal of the american society of nephrology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.755

H-Index - 151

eISSN - 1555-905X

pISSN - 1555-9041

DOI - 10.2215/cjn.00020109

Subject(s) - medicine , icodextrin , peritoneal dialysis , urology , continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis , extracellular fluid , intravascular volume status , dialysis , volume overload , renal function , blood pressure , extracellular , heart failure , biology , microbiology and biotechnology

Cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) has been associated with decreased sodium removal compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as a result of peritoneal sodium sieving during the short dwells that are associated with CCPD. This may have adverse consequences for management of extracellular fluid volume (ECFV). This study compared ECFV in patients who received CAPD or CCPD; CCPD dwell times were maximized by limiting the number of exchanges, and the use of icodextrin for the long daytime dwells was widespread.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research