Chinese Administrative Reforms: A Replica or Derivative of the Western NPM Model?
Author(s) -
Mengzhong Zhang,
Marc Holzer
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
chinese public administration review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2573-1483
pISSN - 1539-6754
DOI - 10.22140/cpar.v8i1.142
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , context (archaeology) , convergence (economics) , politics , political science , public administration , administration (probate law) , political economy , economics , economic growth , law , geography , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology
At the theoretical level in the public administration community, there is an ongoing debate as to whether public administration principles can be universally applied to any country or whether they are bounded by political, economic, social, cultural, historical, environmental and traditional factors. While there is an increasing observation in the 21st century that convergence of administrative reforms between developing and developed countries has great momentum, this paper argues that national context plays a significant (if not vital) role in a specific country’s administrative reforms. To put this argument in context, the paper examines similar and dissimilar features of Chinese administrative reforms with that of USA, with a conclusion that Chinese administrative reform is not a replica, but rather a derivative, of the Western NPM Model. , , , , , . 21 ( ‘’ ) . , , .
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom