z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dorsal versus ventral oral mucosal graft urethroplasty.
Author(s) -
Jalil Hosseini,
Ali Kaviani,
Mokhtar Hosseini,
Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard,
Abdollah Razi
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
urology journal
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.22037/uj.v8i1.932
PURPOSETo evaluate success rate of dorsal versus ventral oral mucosal graft for anterior urethroplasty.MATERIALS AND METHODSIn a retrospective study, the results of the ventral and dorsal oral mucosal graft (OMG) anterior urethroplasty were assessed in 24 and 29 patients, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects were gathered from the medical records.RESULTSPatients were followed up for a mean duration of 32 months (range, 25 to 51 months). The success rates of dorsal and ventral anterior OMG urethroplasty were 83.3% and 75.8%, respectively (P = .5). At penile site, dorsal and ventral OMG were done for 9 and 10 patients with stricture lengths of 3.7 ± 1.1 cm and 3.9 ± 1.2 cm, respectively (P = .7). Success rates of dorsal and ventral penile OMG were 88.9% and 70%, respectively (P = .3). At the bulbar site, dorsal and ventral OMG were performed on 15 and 19 patients with stricture lengths of 4.1 ± 1.1cm and 4.2 ± 1.5 cm, respectively (P = .7). The success rates of dorsal and ventral bulbar OMG were 80% and 79%, respectively (P = .94).CONCLUSIONOral mucosal graft is a versatile and an effective procedure for management of strictures throughout the anterior urethra, and in experienced hands, the outcomes are similarly favorable whether a dorsal or ventral approach is taken.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom