z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Radiation Hormesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Author(s) -
T. D. Luckey
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
dose-response
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.502
H-Index - 36
ISSN - 1559-3258
DOI - 10.2203/dose-response.06-102.luckey
Subject(s) - hormesis , harm , ionizing radiation , deception , medicine , toxicology , psychology , biology , irradiation , physics , social psychology , oxidative stress , nuclear physics
Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people who live in good health with high background radiation. The bad is the nonacceptance of radiation hormesis by the U. S. and most other governments; their linear no threshold (LNT) concept promulgates fear of all radiation and produces laws which have no basis in mammalian physiology. The LNT concept leads to poor health, unreasonable medicine and oppressed industries. The ugly is decades of deception by medical and radiation committees which refuse to consider valid evidence of radiation hormesis in cancer, other diseases, and health. Specific examples are provided for the good, the bad, and the ugly in radiation hormesis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom