z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Confidence: How Much is Enough?
Author(s) -
Peter Neary
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
constitutional forum / forum constitutionnel
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1927-4165
pISSN - 0847-3889
DOI - 10.21991/c9m95j
Subject(s) - parliament , house of commons , constitution , prime minister , government (linguistics) , law , political science , governor , subject (documents) , subject matter , rank (graph theory) , politics , philosophy , engineering , linguistics , library science , computer science , curriculum , aerospace engineering , mathematics , combinatorics
Did Prime Minister Stephen Harper, faced with almost certain defeat in the Commons in December 2008 on a matter of confidence, act unconstitutionally by seeking to prorogue a newly elected parliament that had been sitting for only two weeks? And did Governor General Michaelle Jean violate the principles of responsible government by granting prorogation? These questions have been the subject of intense debate in the Canadian media and may rank with the King-Byng crisis of 1926 in future academic and legal discussion of the constitution. In my opinion, while the prime minister tested the limits of “responsible government,” the Governor General respected precedent and acted appropriately and wisely in her decision.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom