The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions
Author(s) -
Tracy D. Gunter,
Nicolas Terry
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of medical internet research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.446
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1439-4456
pISSN - 1438-8871
DOI - 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e3
Subject(s) - confidentiality , electronic health record , autonomy , masking (illustration) , health care , internet privacy , health records , protected health information , health information technology , public relations , data science , health policy , medicine , computer science , political science , hrhis , computer security , law , visual arts , art
Emerging electronic health record models present numerous challenges to health care systems, physicians, and regulators. This article provides explanation of some of the reasons driving the development of the electronic health record, describes two national electronic health record models (currently developing in the United States and Australia) and one distributed, personal model. The US and Australian models are contrasted in their different architectures (“pull” versus “push”) and their different approaches to patient autonomy, privacy, and confidentiality. The article also discusses some of the professional, practical, and legal challenges that health care providers potentially face both during and after electronic health record implementation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom