z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Enhancing Home Health Mobile Phone App Usability Through General Smartphone Training: Usability and Learnability Case Study
Author(s) -
Richard Harte,
Tony Hall,
Liam Glynn,
Alejandro RodríguezMolinero,
Thomas Scharf,
Leo R. Quinlan,
Gearóid ÓLaighin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jmir human factors
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2292-9495
DOI - 10.2196/humanfactors.7718
Subject(s) - usability , learnability , mobile phone , computer science , usability lab , cognitive walkthrough , heuristic evaluation , human–computer interaction , mobile apps , web usability , phone , usability engineering , multimedia , world wide web , linguistics , philosophy , telecommunications
Background Each year, millions of older adults fall, with more than 1 out of 4 older people experiencing a fall annually, thereby causing a major social and economic impact. Falling once doubles one’s chances of falling again, making fall prediction an important aspect of preventative strategies. In this study, 22 older adults aged between 65 and 85 years were trained in the use of a smartphone-based fall prediction system. The system is designed to continuously assess fall risk by measuring various gait and balance parameters using a smart insole and smartphone, and is also designed to detect falls. The use case of the fall prediction system in question required the users to interact with the smartphone via an app for device syncing, data uploads, and checking system status. Objective The objective of this study was to observe the effect that basic smartphone training could have on the user experience of a group that is not technically proficient with smartphones when using a new connected health system. It was expected that even short rudimentary training could have a large effect on user experience and therefore increase the chances of the group accepting the new technology. Methods All participants received training on how to use the system smartphone app; half of the participants (training group) also received extra training on how to use basic functions of the smartphone, such as making calls and sending text messages, whereas the other half did not receive this extra training (no extra training group). Comparison of training group and no extra training group was carried out using metrics such as satisfaction rating, time taken to complete tasks, cues required to complete tasks, and errors made during tasks. Results The training group fared better in the first 3 days of using the system. There were significant recorded differences in number of cues required and errors committed between the two groups. By the fourth and fifth day of use, both groups were performing at the same level when using the system. Conclusions Supplementary basic smartphone training may be critical in trials where a smartphone app–based system for health intervention purposes is being introduced to a population that is not proficient with technology. This training could prevent early technology rejection and increase the engagement of older participants and their overall user experience with the system.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom