English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

I examine Allen Buchanan’s arguments for enforced beneficence and express a number of worries concerning his attempt to justify coercive distributive policies that guarantee (basic) health care services for all citizens. The central objection questions whether, given Buchanan’s own stipulation of universally-instantiated attitudes of moral beneficence amongst all society members, his arguments from, first, the coordination problem and, second, the assurance problem successfully establish a justification of enforced contribution. I defend alternative, non-coercive, responses to the aforementioned problems and show that a particular kind of institution (an “information service”) provides all citizens with the sufficient and reliable epistemic resources so that they can effectively help the sick and needy. I notice that Buchanan’s difficulties with justifying coercion can be regarded as providing indirect support for the view that developing a justice-based conception of moral health care rights remains, pace Buchanan, an important task to be completed.

UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE