z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
BASIC LIBERTIES, THE MORAL POWERS AND WORKPLACE DEMOCRACY
Author(s) -
Stephen K. McLeod
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ethics politics and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2184-2582
DOI - 10.21814/eps.1.1.57
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , entitlement (fair division) , democracy , premise , element (criminal law) , law and economics , law , sociology , political science , epistemology , philosophy , economics , politics , mathematical economics , biochemistry , chemistry
The article responds to previous work, by Martin O’Neill, about the Rawlsian case for an entitlement to an element of workplace democracy. Of the three arguments for such an entitlement that O’Neill discusses, this article focuses mainly on the one he rejects (on the grounds of its having an implausible premise): the Fundamental Liberties Argument, according to which the right to an element of workplace democracy is a basic liberty. This article argues that while the argument can be improved to withstand O’Neill’s objection, it is invalid. The article sets out a new argument, the Argument from Risk to the Moral Powers. While inspired by the Fundamental Liberties Argument, it is valid. Moreover, its premises are at least as plausible as those of one of the two arguments upon which O’Neill builds his Rawlsian case for an entitlement to an element of workplace democracy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom