z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Multiplexed Diagnostic Platform for Point-of-Care Pathogen Detection
Author(s) -
J F Regan,
S E Letant,
Kristl L. Adams,
R C Mahnke,
N T Nguyen,
J M Dzenitis,
B J Hindson,
D R Hadley,
T J Makarewicz,
B D Henderer,
J W Breneman,
L F Tammero,
J I Ortiz,
R W Derlet,
S Cohen,
W W Colston,
M T McBride,
J M Birch
Publication year - 2008
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/926006
Subject(s) - point of care testing , point of care , virology , medicine , virus , immunology , pathology
We developed an automated point-of-care diagnostic instrument that is capable of analyzing nasal swab samples for the presence of respiratory diseases. This robust instrument, called FluIDx, performs autonomous multiplexed RT-PCR reactions that are analyzed by microsphere xMAP technology. We evaluated the performance of FluIDx, in comparison rapid tests specific for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, in a clinical study performed at the UC Davis Medical Center. The clinical study included samples positive for RSV (n = 71), influenza A (n = 16), influenza B (n = 4), adenovirus (n = 5), parainfluenza virus (n = 2), and 44 negative samples, according to a composite reference method. FluIDx and the rapid tests detected 85.9% and 62.0% of the RSV positive samples, respectively. Similar sensitivities were recorded for the influenza B samples; whereas the influenza A samples were poorly detected, likely due to the utilization of an influenza A signature that did not accurately match currently circulating influenza A strains. Data for all pathogens were compiled and indicate that FluIDx is more sensitive than the rapid tests, detecting 74.2% (95% C.I. of 64.7-81.9%) of the positive samples in comparison to 53.6% (95% C.I. of 43.7-63.2%) for the rapid tests. The higher sensitivity of FluIDx was partially offset by a lower specificity, 77.3% versus 100.0%. Overall, these data suggest automated flow-through PCR-based instruments that perform multiplexed assays can successfully screen clinical samples for infectious diseases

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here